Technical References for PDMS Master Molds
3D-printed PDMS Master Molds Specs:
Typical achievable features:
-
Open channels: ~40-50µm in XY (geometry dependent)
-
Channel heights: ~50-200µm commonly used, 10µm minimum Z height
-
Micro-wells and reservoirs: down to ~50µm features
​
Resolution is highest for open, accessible features.
Printable Geometries:
-
Straight and serpentine channels
-
Cross and T-junctions
-
Droplet generators
-
Gradient Generators
-
Herringbone mixers and Tesla valves
-
Microwells
FAQ
How does the workflow work when ordering PDMS master molds?
Typical workflow:
-
Customer provides CAD or functional requirements
-
Design reviewed for printability and mold durability
-
Design adjustments suggested if required
-
Master mold printed and post-processed
-
Mold delivered ready for PDMS casting
Customers may cast PDMS in-house or request support.
What are typical turnaround times?
Standard PDMS master molds can be printed in 4-6 hours, thus, next day shipments are possible if requested.
Most projects, however, are ready for shipping within 3-5 business days.
How do 3D-printed master molds compare to SU-8 photolithography?
3D-printed master molds:
-
No cleanroom required
-
No photomasks
-
Faster iteration
-
True 3D geometries possible
SU-8 lithography:
-
Higher ultimate planar resolution
-
Higher setup overhead
Do the master molds require silanization or release agents?
No. PDMS can be cast directly onto properly post-processed 3D-printed master molds without surface treatment.
How durable are 3D-printed PDMS master molds?
With appropriate design and handling, master molds can withstand hundreds of PDMS casting cycles.
Durability depends on:
-
Feature height
-
Wall thickness
-
Demolding forces
-
PDMS curing conditions
What surface quality can be expected?
The process delivers a surface finish with an RA value of ~ 0.18µm.
Surface finish is generally not a limiting factor.
Can multilayer PDMS devices be fabricated?
Yes. 3D-printed master molds support:
-
Multi-height features
-
Alignment structures
-
Multi-layer PDMS assembly
What geometries are not possible with PDMS molding?
PDMS molding cannot reproduce:
-
Fully enclosed channels
-
Strong Undercuts (max. 45° recommended)
-
Re-entrant geometries
Such features require monolithic 3D printing or multi-part molds.
Is PDMS still preferable over direct 3D printing in some cases?
Yes. PDMS is preferred when:
-
Gas permeability is required
-
Elastic deformation is needed
-
Surface chemistry modification is critical
-
Established biological protocols depend on PDMS/Silicone
When should PDMS master molds NOT be used?
Avoid PDMS casting if the device requires:
-
Fully enclosed internal channels
-
High internal pressure stability
-
Rigid optical path geometry
-
Direct connectors such as Luerlocks
In these cases, 3D printed monolithic microfluidic devices are superior.
How should researchers decide between Monolithic 3D prints and PDMS?
Use Monolithic prints if:
-
Geometry is complex or fully enclosed
-
Pressure stability matters
-
Fast iteration without bonding is needed
-
Channel rigidity and solid connectors are necessary
Use PDMS if:
-
Elasticity or gas permeability is required
-
Surface chemistry tuning is critical
-
Chip design needs to be reproduced several times
-
Established PDMS workflows must be maintained
